Talk:Viber

RFV discussion: January–February 2018
Tagged but not listed. Existing cites do not meet WI:Brand. Kiwima (talk) 05:26, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 21:16, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

RFD discussion: April 2017–February 2018
Moved from RFV - this belongs more properly in RFD Kiwima (talk) 01:10, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Does it fulfil our criteria for inclusion? I'm not all that convinced. --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Three quotations are in the entry. The question remains whether they meet WT:BRAND, if WT:BRAND applies. The nomination does not state which specific criterion in CFI is being questioned; WT:BRAND is my buest guess. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:12, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Failed RFV and deleted by Kiwima on 5 February 2018. — SGconlaw (talk) 06:19, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It failed RFV because it did not meet WT:BRAND. Kiwima (talk) 19:30, 7 February 2018 (UTC)