Talk:Vicipaedia

RFV discussion: February–May 2018
A very old Latin entry that went a long time without human attention, and is clearly unattestable. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The "long time" is less than 1 year (even when not counting the recent edits) which isn't that long, and there isn't much which could easily be added. Dictionaries like L&S as possible references or further reading don't have the term. Adding cites, especially with translations, isn't easy. Adding etymology isn't easy either (blend of (or ?) + New  (does this exist?), alteration of ?). Simply "unattestable" would have been good enough. -84.161.11.167 23:42, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Your math is bad. It was created in 2004 and received no human attention until 2017. That's about 13 years. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:59, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd bet you could find some uses in Neo-Latin periodicals, but unfortunately these aren't online. --Per utramque cavernam 17:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)