Talk:WUQSXGA

WUQSXGA
sewnmouthsecret 21:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * This seems quite plausible, at least once you know how screen resolutions are named; unless there's something I'm missing, I think it warrants RFV. —Ruakh TALK 22:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Recently, another of these display standards was rejected came up for RfD. I think it was something like PALplus. We could make a presumptive case for all of them or none of them in term of CFI and just make it an RfV matter for individual ones. At least they are not primarily trademarks, even though some or all of them may have trademark status. DCDuring 23:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * This particular one is too new to have any Scholar or Books cites. Groups has 1-2 qualifying possiblities and 3-4 additional mentions. 20 or so others may well meet RfV if we deem them to otherwise meet CFI. I wouldn't spend time on them unless they were deemed CFI-worthy on all other grounds. DCDuring 23:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * In general we do want these, VGA, XGA etc. as well as other standards like HTTP and MIDI and JPEG. - 00:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * There are quite a few of these: List of common resolutions. I don't think that they can be called initialisms though. DCDuring TALK 00:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)