Talk:Walt Disney

Walt Disney
The only purported definitions are for his full name, and two organizations that are essentially of his own creation, or dependent sources. All link to Wikipedia entries, not Wiktionary entries. To be includible this should have attested uses from independent sources. Eclecticology 07:50, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Personally, delete. WT:CFI says there is no consensus about what to include, so in the end it comes down to preference, hence delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:01, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * The person will be disallowed by the vote on names of individuals. Although there should be a way to include company names that have become household words, at present they are strictly not allowed by CFI. This applies to both the entertainment company and its filming subsidiary. Delete, reluctantly. DAVilla 06:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per DAVilla's argument. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 07:40, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * delete. WT:CFI does not states that it comes down to preference, it states that all words are includable. But this is not a single word, and the actual sense is any person with Walt as his first name and Disney as his surname, which is not interesting at all from the linguistic point of view. The same applies to pronunciations: pronunciations at Walt and Disney are sufficient. Lmaltier 07:17, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Deleted. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 16:25, 23 February 2011 (UTC)