Talk:Warshington, D.C.

RFV discussion: January–February 2023
Supposedly a slang term for Washington, D.C. There is at least one quote if we count Ioaxxere (talk) 19:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Great reference! Incidentally, the letter also plainly exposes the ugly, awful truth of the criminal activities of the Amerikan warmongers in D.C. Butterbox1 (talk) 20:03, 21 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The letter is indeed spot on. Surely ‘Warshington’ would pass out attestation requirements as simply a pronunciation spelling of ‘Washington’ in any case though (we have warsh and warshboard). —Overlordnat1 (talk) 20:12, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * can I ask where you heard this term? If you have a link then we can add it as a quotation. Ioaxxere (talk) 21:34, 21 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Plenty of cites on Usenet:
 * How does WT:DEROGATORY apply here? Who is being denigrated "on the basis of ancestry, ethnicity, gender or sex, religion, or sexual orientation"? &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 21:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * “A term is considered derogatory if it is apparently intended to: […] denigrate [a] geographical location […] with the use of a demeaning or obscene term.” — Sgconlaw (talk) 21:32, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I would like to note that since the RFV is for this specific spelling, the quotes should match it. "Warshington" on its own especially should not count towards the number of cites. AG202 (talk) 16:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

RFV Failed (and the entry creator has already been banned) Ioaxxere (talk) 23:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)