Talk:Wikidata

RFD discussion: October 2013–May 2014
—Ruakh TALK 05:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete unless citations that prove it has entered the lexicon are added. — Ungoliant (Falai) 05:40, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:29, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * It's unlikely that this could meet the relevant (WT:BRAND?) standard for attestation. I think it should be held here for the 30-day RfV period rather than be deleted more quickly. DCDuring TALK 13:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Any reason for that? Mglovesfun (talk) 15:38, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Because attestation, which is a defense here as Ungoliant points out, usually takes more time than getting a consensus on deletion. To make the lack of consensus on more rapid deletion clear: Keep unless not attested in a month. DCDuring TALK 15:55, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd say it's an unfair stay of execution. You already said you believe in due process, why not for this? Mglovesfun (talk) 17:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If there is a possibility of attestation, why not? Why be such a deletionist? It'll probably go anyway. DCDuring TALK 23:56, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, as no RFD-relevant reason was stated, and I cannot think of any. If WT:BRAND is the reason for deletion, this is for RFV. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:31, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * RFV as appropriate. (Shouldn't we have RFV as a voting option instead of just "keep" and "delete"?) TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 11:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Sent to RFV. Obviously this is a "word" but it is an RFV matter whether this is a word that meets WT:BRAND. bd2412 T 16:29, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

RFV discussion: May–July 2014
Raised at RFD, but the real question is whether this can be attested to meet WT:BRAND. bd2412 T 16:29, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Either keep all WikiMedia foundation words or delete all of them except Wikipedia and related terms and Wiktionary and related terms because there are still translations that have not yet been blanked. See the difference between Wikimedia and Wikimédia. Ready Steady Yeti (talk) 22:06, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * That's not what CFI says. Certainly Wikipedia has reached a place in culture few other words associated with Wikimedia have, and thus is more likely to meat WT:BRAND.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Failed. — Ungoliant (falai) 02:45, 17 July 2014 (UTC)