Talk:Windsor Framework

RFD discussion: April–July 2023
Encyclopedic. &mdash; S URJECTION / T / C / L / 09:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete for nominator’s reason. — Sgconlaw (talk) 11:09, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * @S URJECTION I don't understand what people mean when they vote to delete an entry as "encyclopedic". Do you mean the entry contains encyclopedic information? If so, cleanup seems more appropriate to me than deletion. Or do you mean that because of the nature of the term itself, any entry we could have for it would be unavoidably encyclopedic? That there is no meaningful lexical information to record? (I honestly want to understand.) &mdash; excarnateSojourner (talk &middot; contrib) 19:36, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The latter. &mdash; S URJECTION / T / C / L / 19:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * @S URJECTION Keep: In the case of this term we have a meaningful etymology, a definition that can be shortened to one descriptive sentence (so as not to be encyclopedic), and a Wikipedia link. I think that's enough to justify an entry (assuming CFI is met). &mdash; excarnateSojourner (talk &middot; contrib) 20:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It's a "name of a specific entity" under our terminology. I fail to see why we should document international agreements. It's the encyclopedia's job to describe such real-world concepts, not that of the dictionary, where we describe language and not these entities. Even place names are iffy under this definition, but the contents of their etymologies and translations generally outweigh these concerns. With an agreement like this, it doesn't apply. They are regularly named after the place in which they are agreed and the translations are completely transparent. &mdash; S URJECTION / T / C / L / 20:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Acolyte of Ice (talk) 13:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) RFD-deleted This, that and the other (talk) 01:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per proponent. PUC – 09:59, 3 June 2023 (UTC)