Talk:Yangzi

Anagrams
There is an anagram relationship between Yangzi and Ziyang; between Gannan and Nangan. However, that relationship seems more special than a normal anagram relationship. Bianjing and Jingbian will have this relationship. & have a similar type of anagram relationship. Are there "levels/degrees of anagrams" or special classifications of anagrams in English language theory? Would this be worthy of tea room or beer parlor review? Thanks for any guidance. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 19:54, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


 * While these are interesting, I'm not sure if there's a particular name for them. Anagrams are purely based on the orthography, so there's no care for larger units other than the character level. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 20:19, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't care in the least about anagrams. DCDuring (talk) 20:29, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


 * If you're talking about anagrams where only a lexical "chunk" has moved, we could say the same about (say) and . There may be something interesting to say about this, but it's not at the anagram level, where we only care about individual letters, and not lexical chunks. Equinox ◑ 01:10, 4 June 2022 (UTC)