Talk:abannition

RFV discussion: May–June 2023
see above, but I did find... 1½ quotes for this form? Definitely not meeting the attestation criteria.—蒼鳥 fawk. tell me if i did anything wrong. 12:57, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * (what does this even mean??)
 * (this is actually just a slightly more elaborate case.)
 * (this is actually just a slightly more elaborate case.)
 * (this is actually just a slightly more elaborate case.)


 * The context of the 1872 cite makes me think the author wanted an "a"-word and looked through the dictionary to find one whose meaning vaguely fit the context. The second cite actually makes it explicit that the dictionary is the immediate source of the words. As far as I am concerned they are of no value for attestation; although technically uses and not mentions, the word is used because it is in the dictionary rather than because the author had in mind ahead of time to express this meaning. This, that and the other (talk) 05:29, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * ...can't believe I didn't notice the author was devising an initialism in the first quote, Christ. I concur with what you said w.r.t. the second quote. 蒼鳥 fawk. tell me if i did anything wrong. 09:21, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

RFV-failed This, that and the other (talk) 13:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)