Talk:abluir

RFV discussion: February 2022–January 2023
It's not in DRAE or Collins and Google books looks like it's finding Portuguese results. It was added long ago by an IP likely borrowing from the existing Portuguese entry. JeffDoozan (talk) 16:45, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Are these valid and Castillian?   (do the semantics here fit?) 70.172.194.25 18:07, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Nice. Well, the second result you provided is now gone, and I couldn't tell you what the first poetic example is saying (beyond a literal translation), but the third is definitely semantically relevant, and Castilian. I'll these last two as quotations. It's surprising even the RAE's historical/diachronic corpus (CORDE) doesn't seem to contain a single example though!--Ser be être 是 talk/stalk 02:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * User:Ser be etre shi: it's still available here: . It seems to fit semantically. 70.172.194.25 03:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * RFV-passed. 70.172.194.25 08:00, 10 January 2023 (UTC)