Talk:abvolution

Request for verification
Sounds legitimate, but can anybody cite it? Equinox ◑ 02:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The term, in this text from 1813, is actually advolution. Mike Halterman 02:24, 19 July 2009 (UTC)


 * We are missing the term advolution, both a Webster's 1913 sense or some contemporary biological sense. But "advolution" is revolving towards and this says it is revolving away from. DCDuring TALK 18:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted. —Ruakh TALK 16:31, 10 December 2009 (UTC)