Talk:adiabatic lapse rate

Tagged by. Not idiomatic, apparently. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I was and remain unsure. It is probably idiomatic, but it seems highly encyclopedic. What I think is almost certainly idiomatic is lapse rate:. DCDuring TALK 20:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)


 * It does seem SOPish, but I think it meets the standard of reasonable doubt, given that many meteorological texts define it explicitly: . -- Visviva 02:57, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Yep, adiabatic + lapse rate, that's all that it is. --Hekaheka 14:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Kept for no consensus.--Jusjih 23:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)