Talk:afore-explained

RFD discussion: July–September 2022
And afore-enumerated. Probably SOP Dunderdool (talk) 09:27, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, SOP in the same way that previously-mentioned and above-stated are. - TheDaveRoss  16:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep if attested. Ƿidsiþ 10:15, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Attestation doesn't factor in to SOP terms; it is easy enough to find use for very fast car but that doesn't make it a lexical unit. If you are saying it isn't SOP that is another story. - TheDaveRoss  12:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, I say that only because I've never encountered this. But if it passes RFV, it should pass RFD since I would consider it a single word (so SOP doesn't really apply). Ƿidsiþ 15:07, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

*Delete, SOP and obvious. Highly unlikely to be looked up in a dictionary. Facts707 (talk) 10:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep aforeexplained per WT:COALMINE as per new info below (thanks). Can't  seem to find aforeenumerated though. Facts707 (talk) 13:26, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @: Cited the one-word variant aforeenumerated. 98.170.164.88 18:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Maybe COALMINE applies?, , , . It's not that far-fetched, cf. aforementioned, aforesaid, aforedescribed, and so forth. 98.170.164.88 20:43, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Created aforeexplained with citations. 98.170.164.88 18:31, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per WT:COALMINE. Binarystep (talk) 23:11, 31 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Kept per all Almostonurmind (talk) 21:54, 14 September 2022 (UTC)