Talk:againbuy

RFV discussion
All Google Books hits seem to be, upon inspection, instances of "again buy", instances of "again" in one column of a page and "buy" in an adjacent column, or typos or scannos of "again by". The entry previously contained one citation, but it was spurious: the metadata was wrong (the work was from ante 1910, not from 2008) and the quotation itself used the two words "again buy", not a single word meaning "redeem". - -sche (discuss) 21:22, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Failed. — Ungoliant (Falai) 14:20, 4 October 2013 (UTC)