Talk:ailihphilia

ailihphilia
Usual garbage, I just want to check before deleting. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:20, 7 October 2009 (UTC)


 * In fairness this gets six hits on Google Books, two of which are usable (if you allow Ailihphilia). So I think it merits at the very least a whole month. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:56, 11 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah,, , , and all definitely use it, whilst this one is unclear. It satisfies the CFI, but the way it’s used clearly requires that it be marked as a nonce word. †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 18:24, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry deleted. I clicked on Doremítzwr's links, and despite his statement that it satisfies the CFI, I'm not convinced. I did put one of them on the citations-page, though. —Ruakh TALK 07:55, 12 July 2010 (UTC)