Talk:alta vista

RFD discussion: February–April 2016
Doesn't look idiomatic to me. --Sit comfy (talk) 10:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. (The Diccionario de la Academia Real makes no mention of it.) -- Romanophile ♞ (contributions) 12:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. When you say "doesn't look idiomatic", do you mean that is does not seem a natural phrase at all, or that it is a natural phrase but is sum-of-parts? Just in case the former, I mention the brand name AltaVista (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AltaVista), which I kind of assumed would be a meaningful phrase. Well, I guess everyone will be familiar with that brand anyway ... 109.152.149.220 03:08, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * As far as WT:CFI is concerned, sum-of-parts (SOP) is what's important here- In Spanish. A brand name with different capitalization and different spacing (that's probably not Spanish) is irrelevant, just as I Can't Believe It's Not Butter! would be if we were considering deletion of an entry based on that phrase. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, I understand that. That is why I said "Just in case the former". 109.152.149.220 18:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)


 * RFD failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)