Talk:alvine evacuations

alvine evacuations
SOP? alvine + evacuations? Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 23:03, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes seems like it; alvine gives the example "alvine discharges" suggesting that there's nothing special about "alvine evacuations" as a combination. Of course evacuation(s) should cover this. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I concur with your observation. On top of that, there is no reason why the lemma entry should be in plural. I don't see anything wrong with saying every alvine evacuation. Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 01:39, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * And it's handily attested in the singular/mass, too. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 17:11, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 17:11, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Deleted. — Ungoliant (Falai) 16:11, 13 August 2012 (UTC)