Talk:anomalos

RFV discussion: August–October 2015
In Greek it is "ἀνώμαλος, -ον" (or with other words "masculine ἀνώμαλος, feminine ἀνώμαλος, neuter ἀνώμαλοςον"), and so it might (also) be "anomalos, -on" in Latin. As simple quotes for "anomala" do not verify the word "anomalos, a, on" other quotes are needed. For verification one needs quotes which use "anomalos" together with a feminine word (like "conjugatio anomalos"), or quotes which use both anomalos/anomalon and anomala very near to each other (like "conjugatio anomala" next to "verbum anomalon"). -84.161.45.214 16:09, E: 16:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * books?id=v4LC-nELjQYC&pg=PA176 - in this book it is "anomalos, -on". Similarily it is "anōmalos (-us), on (um)" in Georges' dictionary, though "anomalus, anomalus, anomalum" seems strange.
 * books?id=XXhVAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA18 - in this older dictionary it is "Anomalos, -a, -on". Similarily it is "ănōmălŏs (-us), a, on (um)" in Lewis' & Short's dictionary.


 * I've added a citation of the Greek-type accusative feminine singular form to Citations:anomalos. Since that form doesn't occur in the Latinate declension (wherein it is ), can I assume that that citation sufficiently supports the feminine columns of the Grecian declension as far as you're concerned? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 20:11, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

RFV passed. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 09:46, 11 October 2015 (UTC)