Talk:antinomismo

Adjectival use
This will have to remain unattested for now; not worth my spending a couple of hours searching for it. Could have sworn I saw it when I first added the Spanish section. Such a use should be permissible grammatically, but other forms apparently are preferred. It will not hurt my feelings much if someone removes the adjective subsection altogether. -- 2603:6081:8004:DD5:497E:E054:AD55:9B4E 01:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Inclusion of Gospel Coalition reference
One of the most common uses of antinomismo and related forms in both Spanish and English is as a set of theological terms whose correct interpretation has been hotly debated in Christendom at least since the time of Luther. Much of the ink spilled in using this "loaded" word has been in arguing over its very definition or, sadly, in hurling it as an accusation against ideological opponents, who commonly respond that their accusers don't even know what it means. One of the most frequent contexts in which it appears is in works attempting to defend a particular view, so an article discussing its meaning seems quite relevant here. In any case, though I probably still don't fully understand the criteria for references, I don't see why, after rereading MOS guidance, the Spanish-language Gospel Coalition article fails to qualify as a valid attestation. -- 2603:6081:8004:DD5:497E:E054:AD55:9B4E 01:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)