Talk:aparecível

RFV discussion: April 2022–January 2023
Portuguese. There seems to be some use in philosophy, always indicated as a non-standard term, but I'm not sure that the meaning given in the entry. There's also a single tweet mentioning "aparecível" with the sense of appearable, but that alone is not enough for attestation. - Sarilho1 (talk) 10:19, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The philosophical uses appear to correspond to the philosophical sense of – as opposed to ; see the use of “the phenomenal universe” in paragraph 13 of (the English translation of) Kant’s inaugural dissertation.  --Lambiam 18:20, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure about the exact definition as we have it, but I think this is cited. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 04:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I think that with the current citations you've added the sense can be considered as attested. - Sarilho1 (talk) 13:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * RFV-passed. 70.172.194.25 18:30, 10 January 2023 (UTC)