Talk:arcana

RFV discussion
RfV-sense for “[a] secret essence or remedy; an elixir”. Etymologically plural, but the sense is a countable singular and the inflexion line calls this noun uncountable. Is this mistaken — in terms of the word’s grammatical, if not its semantic, function? †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 15:43, 31 December 2008 (UTC) This seems identical to the second sense of the singular form. Is this word properly a plurale tantum, whereas its singular uses are ? †  ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 15:48, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


 * RFV failed, sense removed. —Ruakh TALK 13:18, 21 August 2010 (UTC)