Talk:arkeopterigaro

RFV discussion: May–July 2014
Esperanto for a group of archeopteryxes. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 16:28, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Transparent compound, in as much need for an entry as "group of archeopteryxes" needs an entry in English. kwami (talk) 07:44, 27 May 2014 (UTC)


 * This is really not the correct forum for this issue; this is probably a better discussion for Beer parlour. I will say this is one of the affixes that caught me out for irregularity; why homaro (humanity and not a flock of humans) and ŝafaro (a flock of sheep and not sheepdom)?--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:58, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Why isn't this the correct forum? User is questioning whether this meets our criteria for inclusion, specifically attestation. Sounds pretty correct to me. Renard Migrant (talk) 10:32, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I've done a quick search. I say quick, when there are no results for something it's very quick. Speedy as patent nonsense. Renard Migrant (talk) 10:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Kwami was questioning whether or not transparent compounds in Esperanto need entries; that's not a question for RFV. And I disagree in principle with deleting this; it is not patent nonsense, it's an entirely plausible Esperanto word, and we still accept cites from physical works, meaning that there's no way to prove that a word is currently uncitable for any but the most poorly attested languages.--Prosfilaes (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Failed. Transparent or not, it still needs to be in use. — Ungoliant (falai) 01:57, 17 July 2014 (UTC)