Talk:armpithair

definitely non standard, but i don't think it is a misspelling, it seems to follow accepted declension.Lucifer (talk) 00:23, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

RFV discussion: October 2012
The first citation is obvious invalid (it runs other words together, too); the others may also be, given the now-banned contributor's habit of adding invalid citations. If this fails RFV, armpit hair will no longer be protected by COALMINE, and will be deletable as SOP. - -sche (discuss) 07:28, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The third one is for armpit hair. As for the second one, there's no preview available. We need three citations where it's clearly armpithair and not just a scanno. Mglovesfun (talk) 08:26, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * There's, , and . Chuck Entz (talk) 14:44, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't find armpithair in the fourth one, the other three are I suppose valid. Does this mean the term isn't attestable in print, only one Usenet, do we have an label or something? Mglovesfun (talk) 21:34, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * ? - -sche (discuss) 22:19, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't call it a neologism. Frankly, I suspect 95% of the attestations of it are cases where people simply failed to hit the space bar while typing. —Angr 07:01, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree with that, I don't see how any of the cites above can be accepted as quality sources. They are all full of grammatical and spelling errrors.  [1] fails to capitalize proper nouns (despite doing so correctly earlier), [2] "definetely", [3] "the fucking nerve of comming in my mouth", and [4] is invalid in any case. Spinning Spark  08:38, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Also I note pubichair in one of the citations, which is pretty ridiculous, mostly because it looks like . I was also gonna say they could be typos. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:01, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * A seat found in a pub perhaps? Spinning Spark  09:26, 7 October 2012 (UTC)


 * I agree with those above who discount the citations. This therefore looks like it will fail RFV soon. - -sche (discuss) 18:09, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 04:47, 29 October 2012 (UTC)