Talk:ask over

RFD discussion: November 2015–January 2016
Doesn't look like a phrasal verb to me. --SimonP45 (talk) 11:10, 28 November 2015 (UTC) Deleted. bd2412 T 02:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: SoP: +  (MWOnline) DCDuring TALK  12:32, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'm not sure about this one. If I didn't already know the meaning, I might think it implies asking someone with authority over the subject, as in going over the subject's head. bd2412 T 15:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Are you saying that any MWE subject to multiple constructions should therefor be included? If not what makes this different? DCDuring TALK 16:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It uses the same sense of over as come over, be over, head over and invite over: the destination is understood, or is apparent from the context. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:09, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, the usage examples are interchangeable for the 'idiom' and the 'non-idiom'. That's not a good sign. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:21, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: this seems too intransparent, especially for a non-native speaker; too many senses at "ask" and "over". Unfortunately, not much in mainstream dicts; I find it in McGraw-Hill Dictionary of American Idioms and Phrasal Verbs, usingenglish.com, and vocabulary.com. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:36, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, but update over to have a sense of "at one's own house" when applied to a visitor. There is also "come over", "have over", etc. Kiwima (talk) 19:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, per my comments above. bd2412 T 16:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per Kiwima. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 20:48, 22 December 2015 (UTC)