Talk:atheistcuck

RFV discussion: November–December 2022
doesn't exist?
 * Well, searching for "atheistcuck" in quotation marks on regular Google currently yields 96 results, and after the 23rd result the rest are omitted as duplicates. The plural is about the same. Moreover, the sites that use the term aren't the kind we'd ideally like to use as references, for a multitude of reasons. There's nothing on Usenet/Google Groups; there's a little bit of usage, but not all that much, on Twitter. Obviously, this doesn't appear in any durably archived sources like books or journals. We'd need to adopt an extremely generous view toward online sources to admit this. 98.170.164.88 09:36, 25 November 2022 (UTC)


 * This feels like an unwieldy term. There's a reason took off instead of . Binarystep (talk) 03:34, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Failed. — Sgconlaw (talk) 05:14, 9 December 2022 (UTC)