Talk:aunuksen kieli

RFD discussion: April–May 2020
SOP, as above. &mdash; surjection &lang;??&rang; 08:52, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * "as above", as compared to Talk:bulgarian kieli, that is. &mdash; surjection &lang;??&rang; 23:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The inclusion/non-inclusion of open compounds of the form "X:n kieli", and equivalents in other languages, has been a topic of discussion in Wiktionary for years. Now it seems that the non-inclusive party is winning. I would like to point out that in the case of Finnish, Kotus, which is quite reluctant to include any open compounds in their dictionary, has included a number of "X:n kieli" entries in it (including but not limited to suomen kieli, ruotsin kieli, arabian kieli and albanian kieli). I trust this aspect has been given proper consideration in the process. --Hekaheka (talk) 03:23, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * All those entries do is point back to the main entry, though, so their worth is in itself questionable. I'd still argue a usage note in kieli is sufficient. &mdash; surjection &lang;??&rang; 10:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I used to be pro-inclusion. Now I am part of the non-inclusive party. We need to focus on real lemmas. The usage on how to normally form language names is important but we shouldn't demonstrate each possible combination. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 03:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * RFD-deleted (also per precedent) &mdash; surjection &lang;??&rang; 10:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC)