Talk:autonowashing

RFV discussion: January–May 2021
Another hot word with few attestations. Few of the web results seem durable and I also doubt that they are independent. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  08:36, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The word, a piece of argot, was coined in the autonomous technology literature, which is a rapidly growing area of research. What "results" fail independence and durability?
 * Here is the Google Scholar citation profile for the initial article: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&hl=en&cites=11683217585197084451 QRep2020 (talk) 15:52, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Added attestations. QRep2020 (talk) 19:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The Google Scholar citation is fine, but the others are not permanently archived. Can we find anything else? Kiwima (talk) 22:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, I have different attestations to add in that case. Does this one not work though? https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93856 I would think so since it has a DOI and is said to be saved in all kinds of databases: https://www.intechopen.com/how-open-access-publishing-with-intechopen-works. QRep2020 (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I added some different attestations. How is it looking now? QRep2020 (talk) 20:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Over a month has passed after the introduction of new attestations and without further deliberation. Therefore, per Wiktionary:Requests_for_verification, RFV passed. QRep2020 (talk) 19:16, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

RFV-passed (as a hotword) Kiwima (talk) 19:20, 2 May 2021 (UTC)