Talk:avoir la pouasse

RFD discussion: April–June 2017
Tagged several months ago, but I haven't found any discussion here. I personally think it should be deleted. --Barytonesis (talk) 17:27, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as a rare misspelling (WT:CFI). does not find avoir la pouasse, so no frequency ratio can be calculated and it must be rather rare. Furthermore,  finds less than 40 hits when you click to the right multiple times. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The infinitive isn't a good form to use for measuring usage: it's used more as a citation form for mentions than in sentences conveying meaning. It's hard to say anything meaningful about relative frequency when there aren't a lot of hits for any form. Chuck Entz (talk) 17:49, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Deleted as a rare misspelling. — SMUconlaw (talk) 18:22, 5 June 2017 (UTC)