Talk:awoman

RFV discussion: January 2021
Apparently this is unlikely to meet the criterion that three independent attestations exist, so this should not be a hot word to begin with. Parenthetically, it's English chauvinist cringe. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  08:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Cited. J3133 (talk) 09:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * And yet remains a red link.  Vox Sciurorum (talk) 10:12, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah, a Usenet word. RFV passed because there are a ton of clear uses, but try to avoid putting mentions in the entry. ←₰-→  Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  10:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Why isn't it awomen? The original is amen, not *aman. —Mahāgaja · talk 12:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Re “try to avoid putting mentions in the entry”, I know this and it is why I did not put the obvious mentions I saw. J3133 (talk) 15:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)