Talk:baby fathers

RFV discussion: May–June 2020
Is there a reason why the main entry is in the plural? Is it at least idiomatic? --Robbie SWE (talk) 18:23, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The present definition, "Fathers of child in common, particularly unmarried", does not make sense to me. Mihia (talk) 22:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)


 * cited, although I put the quotes at . My guess it was entered as a plural because the term is often used for the father of one of the children of a woman who has children by more than one man — ie one of someone's multiple baby fathers — because it has no connotations of actually playing the role of father to the child, only to conceiving the child. Kiwima (talk) 21:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 01:08, 8 June 2020 (UTC)