Talk:babyloser

RFV discussion — failed
I'm actually RFVing my own word here, because it looks like it might not pass WT:CFI and only Jason Burke has used it (in English, bien sur:). Has anyone encountered this in English by another author? I love saying it in French though. Babby-low-ZUR. Equinox ◑ 00:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure it meets the CFI even as a French word. gets two hits: one unrelated (a blend of w:Babylon 5: and loser:), and one being a copy of the Observer citation you give that references Chauvel directly. ∪ gets four: one Spanish (referencing Chauvel), three German (?). ∪ gets four: one English (the aforementioned Observer article), one Greek (referencing Chauvel), one Spanish (referencing Chauvel), and one Flemish (Belgian Dutch). And  doesn't seem to pull up anything of relevance. All told, this doesn't seem to meet the CFI in any language, especially if we're uptight about independence. (Of course, I only looked at Google-indexed sources, which are bound to miss a great deal, but probably makes it unlikely we can find other durably archived sources.) Sorry. :-/   —Ruakh TALK 01:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Deleted. Equinox ◑ 23:46, 21 June 2009 (UTC)