Talk:band

RFV discussion: October 2016–May 2017
A Cantonese term. One citation is provided. Is it valid? --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 07:01, 23 October 2016 (UTC)


 * —suzukaze (t・c) 08:44, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Does it really make it a Cantonese term!? My previous examples, like "打tennis" "to play tennis"?--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 05:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * What makes it any less Cantonese than ? —suzukaze (t・c) 05:54, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Considered to be an English loanword by this. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 06:14, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Cited. As for Hokkien, I don't know about languages/dialects with semi-standard written forms and Min Nan, including Hokkien is already accepted as a language with a mixed script. Cantonese has at least some standards, such as Hong Kong. As far as I know, using foreign words in foreign scripts in standard Chinese texts (Mandarin) is normally not considered borrowings but mixing languages, such as "iPhone" in a Chinese text will not become Chinese. Is everyone happy to close the case? --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 09:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)


 * RFV passed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 02:22, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

a thousand dollars
Explanation: https://genius.com/18682995 --Backinstadiums (talk) 13:10, 17 January 2020 (UTC)