Talk:baruhu baruh shemó

baruhu baruh shemó
Tagged but not listed. I suppose the issue is either attestation or mistransliteration of the Hebrew spelling. Renard Migrant (talk) 13:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note that it claims to be a Ladino transliteration. But  is written with the Hebrew alphabet, so it's not clear why anyone thinks the entry should exist.  Perhaps the  with the Latin alphabet was meant?  Note also that the Hebrew source phrase itself is missing a vav: "ברוך הוא וברוך שמו". Choor monster (talk) 21:25, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Ladino (or Jud(a)eo-Spanish), while traditionally written in the Hebrew alphabet, is in modern times usually written in the Latin alphabet. We have generally been including both spellings. The problem is that there are various different orthographies in the Latin alphabet. --WikiTiki89 21:31, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I created WT:RFV. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:07, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep in RFD (RFV nom created). --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Kept in RFD. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 16:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

RFV discussion: November 2014–April 2015
Ladino term. Even finds close to nothing. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:06, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I suspect that there is a more common spelling that is attestable, but this certainly isn't it. I would try things like "baruh u uvaruh shemo" or "baruch hu uvaruch shemo" (the latter is also one of the common transliterations of the Hebrew phrase, so it would be hard to attest as specifically Ladino). --WikiTiki89 17:01, 30 November 2014 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 02:27, 6 April 2015 (UTC)