Talk:bathmology

RFV discussion: May–June 2019
Could just be a neologism. Does it fulfil CFI? --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:14, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
 * It is a neologism coined by ,, but easily attestable (although not easily definable), like also here and here. --Lambiam 15:44, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * There is a question of the independence of the cites. We don't consider every reference to an early printer's error in Shakespeare to be an instance of attestation. But at some point the writings of claques do seem to be independent uses. DCDuring (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I have cited this. I would say that the 1975, 2012, and 2019 quotes are independent. Kiwima (talk) 05:52, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 23:18, 12 June 2019 (UTC)