Talk:beaver buster

RFD
The cites given, and others on Google Books, aren't enough IMHO --Simplus2 21:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedily move to RFV (bad nomination). Mglovesfun (talk) 21:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep this is a really common term and the nominator's rationale is a verification one not a CFI one so move to RFVLucifer 22:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Moved to WT:RFV -- please continue the discussion there. -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 19:32, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

RFV discussion: December 2011–March 2012
Moving from RFD per discussion at WT:RFD. Copy of that discussion below. -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 19:27, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Luciferwildcat has had two citations... neither of which are any good. One specific says that it's a pseudonym for a person, one doesn't use it in a sentence but just on its own, so one conveys a different meaning to the one in the entry, one conveys no meaning. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 20:31, 21 March 2012 (UTC)