Talk:being-for-others

RFV discussion: May–September 2017
12-year-old contribution of Hazel Barnes's translation of Sartre's definitions. Are these "definitions" used anywhere besides in Sartre's works and commentaries thereon? DCDuring (talk) 12:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. —Granger (talk · contribs) 13:48, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

RFC discussion: April 2012
Weird. Not very clear. Sense 3 is not a definition. Equinox ◑ 16:30, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * See also being-for-itself by the same editor. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:59, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * And being-in-itself. DCDuring TALK 18:10, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Reference suggests contributor is just reading Hegel. Do we have the sense Hegel uses of being:? DCDuring TALK 18:09, 2 April 2012 (UTC)