Talk:beket

RFV discussion: July–August 2015
This was tagged but not listed. It's another of those words which one IP entered as Turkish and which another IP says isn't Turkish. In the past, some entries like this have been found to be regional/dialectal Turkish, but other entries have been found to be words only in some other Turkic language (e.g. Azeri) and not Turkish. It's hard for those of us who don't speak Turkish to tell which of those is the case. , is this word used in Turkish, and if so can you link to (or type up) some citations from Google Books that show it to be Turkish? Please also take a look at simek (below) and ' and '. On Google Books, I find evidence that beket is used (possibly in another script) in Kazakh, Kyrgyz, and Uyghur. - -sche (discuss) 01:45, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * also pinging - -sche (discuss) 01:58, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * beket cannot be found in TDK, the official Turkish dictioary. It may be of other origin (another Turkish language).--Sae1962 (talk) 11:42, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * beket, simek and kıyın are not native to Istanbul Turkish. In this sense there is no verification. Maybe there exist some Oghusic dialects in Anatolia which retained those words, but are not found in the official Istanbul Turkish language. --Hirabutor (talk) 14:08, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * beket: RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 16:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

simek
As above. Also take a look at and, above, please. - -sche (discuss) 01:46, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Both simek & bağdarlama(k) cannot be found in TDK. I doubt that they are Turkish (and for sure not High Turkish).--Sae1962 (talk) 11:42, 18 July 2015 (UTC)


 * simek: RFV-failed - -sche (discuss) 20:53, 16 August 2015 (UTC)