Talk:beme

RFV discussion: April–May 2022
Yet another word that fails to appear in the usual sources (i.e. the OED and EEBO). Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 12:33, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I've added one mention from 2008. I've also added the "historical" label. I will have to check later for additional cites, but this might be a word like, , etc. Leasnam (talk) 23:02, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * There are 3 cites now. Leasnam (talk) 03:43, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The first of those seems to only be a mention. Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 03:53, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it is. I'll look for another, but I'll keep this one too. It's informative. Leasnam (talk) 15:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Added a third attestation-worthy cite. Now complete. Leasnam (talk) 04:56, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Indeed it is. Cited. Overlordnat1 (talk) 08:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 04:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

RFV discussion: May 2022–January 2023
Etymology 2 somehow got excluded from the RFV of this word; if I recall correctly, I wasn't able to find any post-ME cites of it. Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 05:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * , the cites you provided for this aren't any use, as they appear to be (Middle) Scots, not English. Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 03:48, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * They should be moved to Scots instead of being removed. J3133 (talk) 06:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't disagree, but I currently lack the time and energy to create the appropriate Scots entry. Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 07:53, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

RFV-failed, the RFV'd sense was already removed more than half a year ago. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 20:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC)