Talk:betterererererer

RFV discussion: March–April 2017
Four Google Groups hits, but only three are Usenet, and two are the same post (being quoted), so I think we're one short. Equinox ◑ 23:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I redirected it to betterererer, per WT:CFI. I believe this entry has "three" repetitions, because I counted them this way: "better" + "-er" + "-er" + "-er". According to the linked policy, it seems we still need this RFV to see if we can keep betterererererer as a redirect.
 * Personally, I wouldn't mind creating a few unattested redirects, but I guess we'll have to stop somewhere, or else we'll potentially have redirects for infinite variations, including, say, betterererererererererererererererererer. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 23:46, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * has four repetitions, so it should also be redirected. —CodeCat 13:49, 17 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Resolved. - -sche (discuss) 19:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)