Talk:bibe

Request for verification
From bibe at Requests for verification:

Was removed by an anon; (s)he didn't give a reason, but I'm guessing it's because they doubted its existence, so I rolled back and am listing it here.

(I'm actually confident it's valid, because it was added by, but hey, cites would be good. It really does sound like a joke.)

—Ruakh TALK 04:05, 23 October 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't know about cites, but I found the source reference, and am back-filling the etymology, which is perfectly reasonable. --Catsidhe (verba, facta) 06:06, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * And now there are cites. Do you think 185-ish years of coverage will do? --Catsidhe (verba, facta) 09:03, 23 October 2013 (UTC)


 * RFV passed. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 00:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)