Talk:bicolensis

RFV discussion: May–July 2020
0 GB results for "bicolensem", "bicolensi", "bicolensis" "sunt". Thus this probably is just, which doesn't come from Latin but was simply formed with. --Marontyan (talk) 10:44, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * DCDuring (talk) 13:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The RFV is for the Latin entry and not for the Translingual one. --Marontyan (talk) 18:22, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Do you happen to know where the Translingual inflection templates are? DCDuring (talk) 19:13, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * No, but that's rather a general matter of Translingual, and has nothing to do with the attestation of the Latin entry. See also: Homo sapiens (with its translingual plural, but un-Latin inflection in the accusative "einen Homo sapiens"), ruderalis (with it's translingual Latin-like inflection). --Marontyan (talk) 20:55, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * RFV-deleted (for the Latin, not the Translingual). —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 02:40, 20 July 2020 (UTC)