Talk:bij verstek veroordelen

RFD discussion: April–June 2019
Dutch. In my view an entry bij verstek "in absentia" makes more sense, as this shorter phrase also occurs in other phrasings: bij verstek berechten, bij verstek behandelen vonnis bij verstek, bij verstek een vonnis wijzen. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  10:18, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not only SOP, but the definition given is incomprehensible or else totally misleading, so this is not a loss. I think an entry is more urgent, which also occurs in collocations like ”verstek laten gaan”; ”bij verstek veroordelen” can then be introduced in a usex.  --Lambiam 12:35, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It seems accurate to me, but the legal meaning of may not be the first thing coming to mind when reading it. Added verstek. ←₰-→  Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  13:23, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The combination has a specific meaning that does not correspond to bij verstek. In a legal context, applied to a judgement, it means that the judgement in questioned was occasioned by a party’s defaulting (failing to take action); see . When a verdict (not “condemnation”) is given in absentia, it is given in spite of, not because of, the defendant’s absence.  --Lambiam 15:09, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I know, but based on Google Books it seems that by default also has a more literal legal meaning, , ←₰-→  Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk)  12:14, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


 * RFD deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:23, 6 June 2019 (UTC)