Talk:biological evolution

RFV discussion
Probably sum of parts. Tooironic 09:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Just like financial crisis/economic crisis? If it is SoP, how will attestation help? Move to Rfd. DCDuring TALK 11:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes the definition isn't quite right, it's essentially evolution of a biological nature. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * A sum-of-parts suspicion is for RFD rather than for RFV, I have been recently told. --Dan Polansky 12:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * -_- I'll never get the difference between the two... Tooironic 19:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * FWIW it depends if the definition is correct or not. I think the definition is one aspect of biological evolution, not a true definition of it. However, if it were correct, it could be considered idiomatic. So I think the RFV is still valid. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * There are a lot of Google Book hits for this, so actually citing this given definition might be very very difficult. Ergo, it might fail anyway. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Deleted: not an idiom, no cites. —Ruakh TALK 15:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC)