Talk:black-tie event

black-tie event
SoP, attributive use of black tie, cf. black-tie dinner, black-tie party, black-tie occasion, etc. Conrad.Irwin 11:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:51, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. DCDuring TALK 12:01, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. ---&gt; Tooironic 12:41, 22 May 2010 (UTC)


 * In that case, I'll just Redirect it to black-tie. --LUUWDA 10:43, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * That's for the community to decide. Redirect is one of the common outcomes of a deletion debate, but not this one, it would seem. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:46, 24 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not convinced the redirect is even necessary. Equinox ◑ 15:25, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I would go for a redirect unless there is a good reason not to. —Internoob (Disc•Cont) 20:08, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Only because it's not necessary. If search for this black-tie is the first result anyway. I wouldn't appose a redirect. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:04, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't redirect, that would just be wrong as "black-tie event" is not the same as "black tie". If necessary we can add a usage note/example to black-tie, that contains some of the common attributive uses so that the search will find it. Conrad.Irwin 22:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Deleted by Martin a few days ago. Striking. &#x200b;—msh210℠ 15:40, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah did it moments before leaving the house, sorry about that. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:07, 4 June 2010 (UTC)