Talk:blaspheme

RFV discussion: August 2014–July 2015
RFV of the noun sense synonymous with. I'm having trouble finding a single lemming at OneLook that lists a noun blaspheme or a non-scanno/typo usage of blaspheme as a noun at b.g.c. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 20:53, 20 August 2014 (UTC)


 * "Such blaspheme" finds a handful, but they all look like errors to me. Equinox ◑ 20:55, 20 August 2014 (UTC)


 * In Middle English . See where it is a noun. DCDuring TALK  23:39, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The Century Dictionary's noun (and adjective) entries list only Wyclif and Chaucer as authors, so maybe it should be moved to a Middle English section. If it can be found in Early Modern authors, then maybe it should be tagged "obsolete". —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 20:28, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The OED marks this sense as obsolete, with the latest cite from 1583 (Poems of T Watson). It looks more like Middle English to me.   D b f  i  r  s   08:57, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If it's from 1583, that's well into Early Modern English.--Prosfilaes (talk) 09:05, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, agreed. I wasn't convinced that Thomas Watson was using Chancery Standard because he also wrote in Latin and studied law, but he was educated at Oxford, so he would be using Early Modern.  There's another cite from  W. Bonde Pylgrimage of Perfection in 1526, so I think you are correct that the word survived into Early Modern English.  We should mark it as obsolete.    D b f  i  r  s   09:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC)


 * RFV-passed as an obsolete form of blasphemy, based on the above-mentioned citations. - -sche (discuss) 18:11, 3 July 2015 (UTC)