Talk:bleefully

RFV discussion: April–July 2014
Two citations given. One is using nonsense words without any meaning, and the other appears to be an error for "gleefully". I don't think this word exists as defined at all. Equinox ◑ 14:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I tend to agree with you. The quotes don't convince me. Is it a candidate for deletion? Donnanz (talk) 23:38, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * A nice round number of hits at : round, as in zero.
 * Delete. &#8209;&#8209; Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 00:16, 9 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Failed RFV. Equinox ◑ 21:28, 11 July 2014 (UTC)