Talk:bliss up

RFV discussion: August–October 2012
Sole sense given: to experience bliss.

Not (yet?) attestable, I predict based on my look at bgc and groups. DCDuring TALK 21:31, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I get quite a few hits on Books for "blissed up" Leasnam (talk) 16:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * is bliss up also a drug reference? Leasnam (talk) 17:06, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I would expect it to be. I greatly doubt the meaning given and don't think it exists except in the "-ed"-form. It may well be gradable and therefore blissed up might be and remain an adjective for our purposes. Even it isn't attestably gradable it should be shown as an adjective for now. This route to verbhood in English is common and often there is not a long gap between attestation of "-ing"- and "-ed"-forms in nominal or adjectival use and attestation as a verb (passive with "by", a complement, progressive use, other forms, etc). But sometimes it never happens. DCDuring TALK 17:47, 6 August 2012 (UTC)


 * RFV-failed, moved to blissed up. - -sche (discuss) 23:43, 14 October 2012 (UTC)