Talk:blood-and-soil

Attributive?
Isn't this just an attributive form? The two citations definitely look like attributive uses to me. These shouldn't be included as per Votes/2019-05/Excluding_self-evident_"attributive_form_of"_definitions_for_hyphenated_compounds. &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 05:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, I missed that discussion. It should probably be deleted then. – Jberkel 12:33, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I've saved the quotation to the citations page. &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 12:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * BTW, if you disagree with this policy, consider bringing it up in the BP or starting a formal vote. If you want to bring these forms back, I think a policy by which it might be possible to gain consensus is to allow them only for entries that are themselves inclusion-worthy, so that we don't end up with things like never-to-be-repeated. &mdash; Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 12:44, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * It is a bit weird, in this specific case it looks like the hyphenated form could be more common than the "main" form. – Jberkel 15:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)