Talk:bonumque

RFD discussion: September 2018
I thought that we didn't include Latin words with "que" stuck on the end (whatever plus "and"). SemperBlotto (talk) 19:46, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedied per Talk:fasque. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 20:39, 18 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment: There was an earlier discussion on the talk page of About Latin, which, however, was somewhat inconclusive, and the discussion at Talk:fasque, where the conclusion was to delete. Indeed, the convention appears to be not to include these – with exemptions for words where the meaning is not simply “and X”, such as and . I’m undecided on the issue, but if such words are included because they nominally pass the CFI, it should be in a lightweight way, just like we deal with plurals and many verb forms. Something like “conjunctive form of bonum”.  --Lambiam 21:05, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * That discussion was 6 years ago. The one I linked to (and which links to other related discussions) upholds the convention that we follow. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 22:14, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Some discussion here, too. Schyler (talk) 19:57, 25 September 2018 (UTC)