Talk:botiality

RFD discussion: March–April 2017
Only 8 hits on google. gets none. Borders on protologism. — JohnC5 17:05, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedied as a clear protologism. I'm assuming your placing it in RFD rather than RFV was simply a careless mistake, and that your unwillingness to speedy it was due to a desire to avoid conflict with the creator, but the lack of raw Google hits shows that this could obviously not pass WT:ATTEST. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:38, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I was being overly proceduralist because I grow tired of these arguments. I also so rarely do things that involve RFD/V that I always mess it up. — JohnC5 21:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I will take over the arguing for you if you need me to. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you! — JohnC5 21:47, 2 April 2017 (UTC)